The Short Version
- Neither war is stalled — both are being run as strategies. Russia is trading casualties it doesn’t price for time it believes favors it. Iran is metering the Strait of Hormuz, not closing it, and as of this week, preparing to charge tolls for the privilege.
- That makes the risk premium a level, not a spike. The Brent curve still slopes down into 2027. If both parties benefit from the unresolved state, that curve is a bet, not a forecast.
- A corn rally is not a rescue. Pro Farmer’s yield cut lifted futures to a three-year high, which is welcome, and does nothing about a cost side that is being set in Moscow, Tehran, and Beijing.
Attrition Is the Strategy, Not the Failure Mode
In the four weeks ending August 11, Russian forces netted about 33 square miles of Ukraine — one and a half Manhattans — while July produced their highest casualty rate of the year. If the goal is Kyiv, that’s failure. If it’s outlasting Western attention spans, it’s the cost of doing business. Hydrocarbon revenue has fallen from roughly half the federal budget in the mid-2010s to 22% in 2025, with tax increases backfilling the rest. Sanctions reshaped Russia’s logistics and discounts; they didn’t cut export volumes.
The piece that matters for anyone buying phosphate: Russia’s industrial sulfur export ban runs through year-end, and sulfur is still up roughly 260% year-over-year. Sulfuric acid is what turns phosphate rock into DAP and MAP. Meanwhile China has extended its phosphate export restrictions through August, now covering an estimated 50-80% of its export volumes. Two states, two press releases, one cost curve.
Ambiguity Is the Asset
Watch the water, not the podium. Iran has been selectively permitting passage — granting Iraqi tankers transit on request — while threatening to seize vessels that violate its rules and to strike the alternative Omani routes. Last Sunday its parliament advanced a provision charging ships for “services” rendered in the strait.
That is the whole thesis in one headline. A country trying to close a waterway does not build a toll booth.
The formal 60-day ceasefire window has now lapsed. Treasury Secretary Bessent has promised what he calls the single greatest financial offensive ever mounted, with secondary sanctions aimed at third countries and China explicitly not exempt. Escalation, in other words — but escalation is not resolution, and both sides appear content to keep the file open.
What It Means to the Corn Belt
Brent is near $90 after a two-week run toward $93, up about a third year-over-year. Note the shape: October trades near $92, March 2027 near $83. The market is pricing mean reversion. That is precisely the assumption I’d question.
The farm-gate numbers tell a different story than the benchmarks. International urea has softened to roughly $390/T, down 11.5% year-over-year. But DTN’s retail survey has anhydrous at $964/ton, up 27% from a year ago, and DAP at $917, up 11%. Seven of eight nutrients are more expensive than last year. Whatever relief exists offshore is not arriving at the local plant.
Which brings us to the corn rally. Pro Farmer pegged the crop at 173.2 bu/acre against USDA’s 180.7, roughly 670 million bushels lighter, and futures hit their highest close since July 2023. Take the price. Just don’t mistake it for a fixed margin: the revenue side moved on weather, and the cost side is still being set by policy in three capitals.
Three Disciplines
Stop waiting for the peace-deal dip. Buy inputs like you market grain — incremental, scheduled, unemotional. There is no trigger date.
Budget the margin, not the revenue. A three-year high in December corn means nothing without the cost side locked alongside it.
Protect liquidity over equity. Land values flatter the balance sheet; working capital carries you through a two-sided squeeze.
We’ve been treating this as weather when it’s climate.
This newsletter may reference or quote publicly available information believed to be reliable. Any third-party content is used under principles of fair use for purposes of commentary, education, analysis, and criticism. All trademarks, service marks, and copyrights remain the property of their respective owners. No infringement is intended. This publication is provided for informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice or a solicitation to buy or sell any commodity, security, futures contract, option, or other financial instrument. Opinions expressed are those of the author as of the date of publication and are subject to change without notice. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Trading futures, options, and derivatives involves substantial risk and is not suitable for all investors. This newsletter is not for sale, redistribution, or republication, in whole or in part, without the express written consent of the author.
